Home / Lean Six Sigma / Work measurement & methods

Work sampling calculator

Plan the rounds, record what each person or machine is doing at random times and find out how much of the time goes to work, waiting, setups and downtime, with confidence interval and standard time.

Pre-sizing and estimating tool: results do not replace design, calculations or reports signed by a licensed professional, nor verification against the applicable codes and standards.

Preliminary estimateRevised 11/02/2026

This page is work sampling (snap observations to measure how much time goes to each activity). To decide how many parts to inspect in an incoming lot, use attribute acceptance sampling (AQL).

Study identification
Planning the number of observations
Rounds
Observations made
See what was read

Separate the daily counts with spaces. From Excel, paste one row per category with the name, the type and one column per day.

Standard time

If unavoidable delays already show up as a measured category, do not add them again to the allowances.

Your inputs stay only on this browser and are not sent anywhere. Untick to delete them.

—Standard time per part
—

Time split by category

Share of observations in each category; the tooltip shows the confidence interval.

Tap the chart to see the values.

p chart: working percentage by day

Each day with the overall average and 3-sigma limits.

Tap the chart to see the values.

Observations needed versus precision

For the share estimated in planning, at three confidence levels; the dashed line is the total observed so far.

Tap the chart to see the values.

Result by category

Observations, percentage, confidence interval and equivalent hours in the period.

Round plan (random times)

Next step

Take this page’s results to another calculator with the fields already filled in.

The calculation report gathers this page's inputs, results, equations, assumptions and references, with fields for project, engineer and revision. The full report also includes the charts and interpretations, in color. In the print dialog, choose Save as PDF.

Method, assumptions and references

Equations used

Observations needed, relative precision s: n = z² · (1 − p) ÷ (s² · p); absolute precision e: n = z² · p · (1 − p) ÷ e²
Rounds per day = round up [n ÷ (days × observations per round)]; z = 1.645 (90%), 1.96 (95%), 2.576 (99%)
Observed share p = x ÷ N; confidence interval p ± z · √(p · (1 − p) ÷ N)
Daily p chart: limits = p̄ ± 3 · √(p̄ · (1 − p̄) ÷ nᵢ)
Standard time = (hours observed × working share × performance rating ÷ output) × (1 + allowances)

Assumptions and limits

  • Independent observations at random times, of categories that do not overlap; the share of observations estimates the share of time.
  • Confidence interval from the normal approximation to the binomial, adequate when N · p and N · (1 − p) exceed 5; people seen on the same round are treated as independent.
  • Times drawn with a pseudo-random generator (mulberry32) from the seed, in whole minutes of the shift outside the break, keeping the minimum gap between rounds.
  • Standard time assumes the output entered was produced by the same group in the hours observed and that the rating represents the whole period.

Standards and technical documents

  • Kanawaty, G. (ed.). Introduction to Work Study, 4th ed. International Labour Office, 1992 (work sampling)
  • Barnes, R. M. Motion and Time Study: Design and Measurement of Work, 7th ed. Wiley, 1980
  • Niebel, B.; Freivalds, A. Methods, Standards, and Work Design, 13th ed. McGraw-Hill, 2014
  • Tippett, L. H. C. A snap-reading method of making time-studies of machines and operatives in factory surveys. Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions, 26, 1935
  • Montgomery, D. C. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 8th ed. Wiley, 2019 (carta p)

U.S. regulations

  • Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 CFR 785.18: rest periods of 5 to 20 minutes count as paid time
  • Collective bargaining agreements often govern time standards and work measurement (National Labor Relations Act)

Frequently asked questions

What is work sampling and when should I use it instead of a time study?

It is a study made of snap observations: at random times the analyst records what each person or machine is doing at that moment. The share of times an activity shows up estimates the share of time it takes. Use it when the work is not repetitive (maintenance, stockroom, small-batch assembly), when you want to measure waiting and downtime, or when you want to observe many people at once; for a short, repetitive cycle, a stopwatch time study is more precise.

How is it different from AQL inspection sampling?

They are different things with similar names. Attribute acceptance sampling (AQL, ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 / ISO 2859-1) decides how many parts of a lot to inspect to accept or reject the lot. Work sampling measures how people’s and machines’ time splits between work, waiting, setups and downtime. For lot inspection, use the attribute sampling calculator.

How many observations do I need?

With relative precision: n = z² × (1 − p) ÷ (s² × p). In the example, with 75% working time, ±5% relative and 95% confidence (z = 1.96), that is 513 observations. With ±5 points of absolute precision, n = z² × p × (1 − p) ÷ e² gives 289. At 99% confidence and ±5% relative it rises to 885. The smaller the activity you want to measure, the more observations you need.

How should I organize the rounds?

Spread the observations over the days and the people seen per round. In the example, 513 observations over 5 days with 8 people per round give 13 rounds a day (520 observations). The times are random and change from day to day; the calculator draws them from a seed so you can print the plan and the field sheet. Spread the days over the week and the shifts you want to represent.

How do I read the example result?

Out of 520 observations, 390 found people working: 75.0%, with an interval of 71.3% to 78.7% at 95% confidence. The precision achieved is ±4.96% relative, within the ±5% requested. On the p chart, all 5 days fell between 73.1% and 76.9%, inside the 62.3% to 87.7% limits: the process was stable and the days can be pooled. Waiting for material is the largest loss, 8.1% of the time, about 26 hours in the period.

How does work sampling give a standard time?

Standard time = hours observed × working share × performance rating ÷ output × (1 + allowances). In the example: 320 h × 75% × 95% ÷ 4,800 parts = 2.85 min of normal time; with 12% allowances, 3.19 min per part, or 18.8 parts per hour. Output must come from the same group and days observed, and the rating should be assessed during the rounds.

What precautions and limits apply?

Tell the crew and explain that the study measures the process; hidden observation tends to breed distrust and worse data. Categories must not overlap and must be defined before you start. Cover every weekday and shift you want to represent. The confidence interval uses the normal approximation, which breaks down when a category shows up fewer than 5 times. Where a union represents the employees, time studies and standards are usually covered by the contract.